Abstract
This paper offers a model to explain how self-selection can lead to the situation where a meritocratic judiciary has a median political preference that is different from the median of the electorate. The model is then applied to the case of the Netherlands, where the median political preferences of the judiciary is left of center whereas the median political preference of the electorate is right of center. In doing so, the paper offers an indirect test of the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making that does not rely on the comparison between judicial ideology and judicial decisions. The paper further shows that a meritocratic and independent judiciary can nonetheless be biased. The paper concludes by offering a solution to those who consider this to be a problem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
