Abstract

Social norms are commonly used to investigate visitor beliefs about acceptable wildlife encounters in parks and protected areas. However, there is little information detailing if self-reported norms match actual behaviors. This study compared self-reported norms (n = 304) for viewing distances of adult and cub black bears with behavioral observations (n = 355) of actual encounters at Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, North Carolina, USA. First, we conducted a crossover design to examine the impact of viewing different groupings of bears at varying distances on acceptability beliefs. Our design significantly affected self-reported, minimum acceptable distance thresholds for an adult bear with cubs (Sequence 1 = 40.69 m; Sequence 2 = 48.24 m). Next, we found self-reported thresholds strongly differed from actual behaviors: 45 % of observations documented visitors closer than 40.69 m from bears. These findings illustrate the value of mixed-methods approaches to understand wildlife viewing behaviors and inform management actions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.