Abstract
The interconnects used in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are usually shaped into a corrugated form that creates gas channels. Coatings are applied onto an interconnect to increase its longevity by reducing Cr(VI) evaporation and oxide scale growth. To date many manufacturers first deform the interconnect and then apply the coating. However, the reverse (hereinafter termed pre-coating) would be more cost-effective, because large-scale roll-to-roll coating processes could then be used instead of batch coating processes. The drawback of this method is that cracks are introduced into the coating during deformation. The present work shows that the cracks heal after relatively short exposure times for the often-used Ce/Co coating (10 nm Ce and 640 nm Co) even at low operating temperatures (650 °C and 750 °C). The Cr evaporation rate of pre-coated deformed Ce/Co-coated AISI 441, even though slightly elevated in the beginning of the exposure, decreases and stabilizes to rates that are comparable to that of undeformed Ce/Co-coated AISI 441. SEM micrographs show that the cracks introduced during the shaping of the interconnect heal after roughly 70 h of exposure at 750 °C and 360 h of exposure at 650 °C.
Highlights
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology is a promising green energy conversion technique that could be highly relevant for the future [1,2]
All exposures were carried out for 500 h, except for the Cr evaporation rates depicted as filled symbols, which were run for the intermediate times, i. e. 71 h at 750 ◦C and 111 h at 650 ◦C
The reason different time intervals had to be employed for the two different temperatures was the rather small amounts of hexavalent Cr species that evaporated at 650 ◦C in combination with the sensitivity of the UV–Vis analysis
Summary
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology is a promising green energy conversion technique that could be highly relevant for the future [1,2]. A major share of the overall cost of a fuel cell stack is the interconnect, which connects separate fuel cells to form a fuel cell stack and is typically made of ferritic stainless steel (FSS) [3,4,5,6]. This component has previously contributed to roughly 35% of the entire stack cost [7]. Further improvements are still needed both in terms of material cost and ease of manufacturing
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.