Abstract

Based on the oil and gas component data of an offshore gas field in West Africa, the steady‐state models of the triethylene glycol (TEG) dehydration process and the low‐temperature separation dehydration process are established. The adaptability of two kinds of processes to the disturbance of pressure, temperature, and flow of imported natural gas source is studied, and the sensitivity analysis is carried out. In addition, the investment cost and operating cost of the two types of processes are compared. The low temperature separation dehydration process is more adaptable to the disturbance of inlet gas source than the TEG dehydration process. The former is more expensive to build than the latter, but less expensive to run. The low temperature separation dehydration is preferred as the natural gas dehydration process which is more suitable for floating production storage and offloading.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call