Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive application of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach to evaluate and rank different models of welding goggles. The study uses both the Mean Weight and Entropy Weight methods in conjunction with five different MCDM techniques—TOPSIS, CODAS, COPRAS, SAW, and MOORA. These methods provide an insightful comparison and robust ranking of various goggle models. The analysis consistently highlighted 'ArcOne The Fly Safety Goggles' and '3M Speedglas 100 Series' as superior performers across multiple criteria.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.