Abstract
This contribution to the polyphonic debate agrees with the authors about the importance of making interpretative accounting research more relevant. It argues that the ways of seeking relevance could, however, be very diverse; with some researchers seeking to intervene in individual organisations through interventionist research, while others might be more concerned to draw out the social and political consequences of accounting in modern organisations. For the researchers who seek to intervene in practice, it will be important to combine the theoretical knowledge of accounting researchers with the craft knowledge of accounting practitioners. Nevertheless, for such research to be publishable in international research journals it must continue to be firmly grounded in theoretical understandings and also seek to extend existing theoretical knowledge, as well as raising practical implications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.