Abstract

Job performance is amongst the most common dependent variables in organizational behavior research. Despite this volume of research, however, we argue that a major barrier to comprehensive understanding of the drivers of job performance is a “positivity bias” amongst those who study it: a dual tendency to assume high performance is driven by positive (rather than negative) psychological variables, and low performance is driven by negative (rather than positive) psychological variables. We evidence this positivity bias through analysing 20 years of hypothesizing on job performance across 8 leading organizational behavior journals. We also canvas potential causes of this bias, and conclude with recommendations for cultivating a more balanced perspective on the psychology of success in the workplace.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.