Abstract

ABSTRACT Rather than accept the mainstream view that the state needs need to be brought back in to regional thinking, the paper argues that the state – and the analysis of it – is restricting understandings of urban and regional change and leading to a state-territorial trap. Analysing over 40 years of literature on growth-oriented regionalism, the paper reveals important blind spots in the approaches to researching regions (and other forms of place-making) and the role of business in regional development, planning and governance. Presenting a comparison of two spatial governance projects in the UK – The Peel Group’s Atlantic Gateway Strategy and UK government’s Local Enterprise Partnerships – it is revealed how business-orchestrated regionalism is a new empirical reality, but one we are ill-equipped to understand. It argues that we need to move beyond the conceptual and methodological lock-in of business-as-usual approaches to start ‘seeing like a business’ and revealing the practical politics and pragmatism by which actors – both state and business – are engaging to effect regional change and shape regional futures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call