Abstract

The Dutch coastal maintenance policy which was implemented in 1990 aims at fighting structural erosion by nourishing sand. Initially, the beaches were nourished. The lifetime of these beach nourishments turned out to be relatively short (~2 yrs), especially at identified erosion 'hotspots' along the North-Holland coast (e.g. Egmond aan Zee). Therefore, from 1999 on, an alternative approach was considered, in which beach nourishments were combined with large nourishments on the shoreface (seaward of the outer breaker bar). In recent years, the evolution of individual shoreface nourishments was analyzed on a spatial scale of kilometres and a temporal scale of years, with a focus on their cross-shore development (e.g., Van Duin et al., 2004). In these studies, their alongshore interaction received little attention. The main objective of the present study is to investigate the evolution and lifetime of five large (~1-2 million m3) shoreface nourishments applied between 1999 and 2005 on a spatial scale that includes the larger part of the North-Holland coast (~40km). The analysis of bathymetrical data shows that all five shoreface nourishments evolved into new outer bars with deep troughs on their landward side, that temporarily interrupted the 'autonomous' cyclic offshore migration of breaker bars (e.g. Wijnberg, 1995). Alongshore, the nourishment placed at Camperduin in 2002 connected to the existing outer bar, while the nourishments placed at Egmond aan Zee and Bergen in 1999 and 2000 respectively, remained isolated. The 2004 Egmond and 2005 Bergen nourishments interconnected into a long bar. At Camperduin, the newly formed outer bar remained quite stable in the years after its placement. The bars resulting from the 1999 Egmond aan Zee and 2000 Bergen nourishments, however, almost fully disintegrated within five years, while the interconnected bar of the 2004 and 2005 nourishments is still largely intact after 5 years. The results suggest that the effectiveness of shoreface nourishments is influenced by their shore-parallel length and their ability to connect to surrounding (natural or nourishment) bars. The observed morphodynamic patterns suggest that the 'lost' sand is mainly redistributed to the breaker zone, and further transported alongshore.

Highlights

  • The coastal policy in the Netherlands is primarily aimed at protecting the low-lying areas against flooding

  • From 1999 on, an alternative approach was considered, in which beach nourishments were combined with large nourishments on the shoreface

  • The main objective of the present study is to investigate and compare the evolution and lifetime of five large (~1-2 million m3) shoreface nourishments, all applied at a 15 km-long stretch of the NorthHolland coast between 1999 and 2005, in order to get a better understanding of the factors controlling their lifetime

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The coastal policy in the Netherlands is primarily aimed at protecting the low-lying areas against flooding. The coastal area was (and is) protected by series of dune ridges. Vulnerable locations in the beach-dune system were reinforced by building groynes, dikes and seawalls. Since about 1950, sand nourishments were occasionally applied to reinforce weak parts of the sea defence. In 1990, the Dutch government decided to fight structural coastal erosion. A reference coastline was appointed that was based on the coastline position of that year. The actual coastline position is checked against this reference every year (see, e.g., Hillen & Roelse, 1995; Van Koningsveld & Mulder, 2004). Locations that have lost significant volumes of sediment due to coastal erosion are nourished with sand

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call