Abstract
Alternative methods for hospital occupancy forecasting, essential information in hospital crisis planning, are necessary in a novel pandemic when traditional data sources such as disease testing are limited. To determine whether mandatory daily employee symptom attestation data can be used as syndromic surveillance to estimate COVID-19 hospitalizations in the communities where employees live. This cohort study was conducted from April 2, 2020, to November 4, 2020, at a large academic hospital network of 10 hospitals accounting for a total of 2384 beds and 136 000 discharges in New England. The participants included 6841 employees who worked on-site at hospital 1 and lived in the 10 hospitals' service areas. Daily employee self-reported symptoms were collected using an automated text messaging system from a single hospital. Mean absolute error (MAE) and weighted mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7-day forecasts of daily COVID-19 hospital census at each hospital. Among 6841 employees living within the 10 hospitals' service areas, 5120 (74.8%) were female individuals and 3884 (56.8%) were White individuals; the mean (SD) age was 40.8 (13.6) years, and the mean (SD) time of service was 8.8 (10.4) years. The study model had a MAE of 6.9 patients with COVID-19 and a weighted MAPE of 1.5% for hospitalizations for the entire hospital network. The individual hospitals had an MAE that ranged from 0.9 to 4.5 patients (weighted MAPE ranged from 2.1% to 16.1%). For context, the mean network all-cause occupancy was 1286 during this period, so an error of 6.9 is only 0.5% of the network mean occupancy. Operationally, this level of error was negligible to the incident command center. At hospital 1, a doubling of the number of employees reporting symptoms (which corresponded to 4 additional employees reporting symptoms at the mean for hospital 1) was associated with a 5% increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations at hospital 1 in 7 days (regression coefficient, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.07; P < .001). This cohort study found that a real-time employee health attestation tool used at a single hospital could be used to estimate subsequent hospitalizations in 7 days at hospitals throughout a larger hospital network in New England.
Highlights
Given the limited testing for COVID-19 early in the pandemic, multiple businesses, including hospitals, required employees to report any symptoms associated with COVID-19 and directed symptomatic employees to obtain follow-up testing
The individual hospitals had an Mean absolute error (MAE) that ranged from 0.9 to 4.5 patients
At hospital 1, a doubling of the number of employees reporting symptoms was associated with a 5% increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations at hospital 1 in 7 days
Summary
Given the limited testing for COVID-19 early in the pandemic, multiple businesses, including hospitals, required employees to report any symptoms associated with COVID-19 and directed symptomatic employees to obtain follow-up testing. Such symptom reporting tools may have additional secondary benefits. Given that prior research has noted that community spread of COVID-19 makes up the bulk of the burden of new infections in health care settings,[5] employee attestations of symptoms may have a secondary use as syndromic surveillance to estimate the incidence and prevalence of infections in the communities where employees live
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have