Abstract

The role of the herbaceous layer in carbon assimilation and nutrient cycling is still undiscovered and unappreciated. One reason is that simple methods of annual net primary production (ANPP) estimation often underestimate its value, while more accurate methods are too labor-demanding. Moreover, studies on herbaceous layer and litterfall biomass in the same study site are extremely rare and usually conducted during one vegetation season, providing temporally-specific estimates. We hypothesized that (1) the seasonal herb layer biomass dynamics show a two-peak shape and (2) contribution of herbaceous layer biomass production in annual litter production was not more than 5% of tree litterfall. We studied the herb layer and litterfall biomass dynamics in an oak-hornbeam forest in W Poland for three years (January 2013 – October 2015). Samples of the herb layer (ten samples for four sample plots) were collected weekly in March, April and May or every two weeks for the remainder of each year, and litterfall was collected every month. All herb plants were cut at the soil level from circular frames with an area of 0.16 m2. Litterfall was studied with thirty litter traps (height of 15 cm, and catching area of 0.36 m2). We performed Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc tests to assess differences in variables among all collection times and linear random effects models to assess variance sources. We observed the highest biomass in 2013 on May 3rd (47.05 g m−2), and the lowest on October 30th in 2015 (4.69 g m−2). The seasonal herb layer biomass dynamic showed a single-peak shape; a very distinct peak occurred in spring and continued in late spring, summer, and early autumn. The spring ephemeralAnemone nemorosahad the highest share of herbaceous layer ANPP with 27% and was responsible for the spring biomass peak every season. The mean contribution of the herb layer biomass in annual litterfall was 9.23%. Our results highlight the underestimation of the herb layer role in biomass production in forest ecosystems in previous studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call