Abstract
The NA62 experiment recorded a large sample of K+→μ+νμ decays in 2007. A peak search has been performed in the reconstructed missing mass spectrum. In the absence of a signal, limits in the range 2×10−6 to 10−5 have been set on the squared mixing matrix element |Uμ4|2 between muon and heavy neutrino states, for heavy neutrino masses in the range 300–375 MeV/c2. The result extends the range of masses for which upper limits have been set on the value of |Uμ4|2 in previous production search experiments.
Highlights
Non-zero masses and mixing of the Standard Model (SM) neutrinos are firmly established
To achieve hermetic acceptance for photons emitted in K + decays in the fiducial decay volume (FV) at angles up to 50 mrad, the liquid krypton (LKr) calorimeter is supplemented by annular lead glass large-angle veto (LAV) detectors installed in 12 positions along and downstream of the FV, and two lead/scintillator sampling calorimeters located close to the beam axis
Inputs to the computation of the numbers N K of kaon decays in the FV: numbers of selected data events in the SM signal region, acceptances evaluated with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and their statistical errors, and K + →
Summary
Non-zero masses and mixing of the Standard Model (SM) neutrinos are firmly established. The beam is accompanied by a flux of muons produced by K + and π + decays upstream of the vacuum tank (the beam halo), with 3 MHz nominal rate in the detector acceptance. The momenta of charged K + decay products are measured by a magnetic spectrometer (STRAW) located in the vacuum tank downstream of the FV. To achieve hermetic acceptance for photons emitted in K + decays in the FV at angles up to 50 mrad, the LKr calorimeter is supplemented by annular lead glass large-angle veto (LAV) detectors installed in 12 positions along and downstream of the FV, and two lead/scintillator sampling calorimeters (intermediate-ring calorimeter, IRC, and smallangle calorimeter, SAC) located close to the beam axis. Loose timing conditions are used in this analysis because the accidental rates are small, due to the low beam intensity
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call