Abstract
The hydration shell of proteins plays key roles in protein stability, folding, recognition, and enzyme activity. However, it remained unclear whether the hydration shell predicted by explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations matches experimental conditions, while accurate experimental probes of the hydration shell structure remained limited. Small-angle scattering (SAS) in solution using X-rays (SAXS) or neutrons (SANS) in principle provides information on the hydration shell, since both the radius of gyration (Rg) and the zero-angle scattering (I0) depend on the hydration shell contrast relative to bulk solvent. Using MD simulations and explicit-solvent SAXS/SANS calculations, we computed Rg and I0 for five different proteins and a set of 18 different combinations of protein force fields and water models, and we validated the simulation results against consensus data from a recent worldwide round robin benchmark (Trewhella, Vachette et al., doi:10.1107/S2059798322009184). Overall, we find remarkable agreement between MD simulations and consensus SAS data; however the agreement is force field dependent. Certain force field/water model combinations underestimate the hydration layer contrast significantly, while water models with increased dispersion interactions may, for some proteins, overestimate the hydration layer contrast. Our study shows that explicit-solvent SAS calculation and consensus SAS data provide a novel route for scrutinizing the hydration layer of proteins.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.