Abstract
Critical thinking (CT) has assumed the status of an obligatory graduate attribute in Western English-medium instruction higher education, with accompanying expectations that such thinking be evident in students’ academic literacy practices. These literacies are presented to students from outside English-dominant settings as higher-order language skills, as evident in, for example, English-for-Academic-Purposes programs, reflecting widely-held assumptions that CT is not a dimension of academic literacy practices of many non-English dominant education systems, particularly those reductively categorized as ‘Asian’. In this chapter, we use interview data from multilingual Chinese academics of diverse ethnolinguistic backgrounds to scrutinise assumptions that CT is not recognised nor encouraged in Chinese HE. Drawing on the responses of these academics, we also contest essentialization of the character of Chinese HE as bounded by inflexible traditional knowledge practices, and point to the experiences of these academics of English-medium education and collaboration as a source of dynamism in Chinese HE. Given the impetus for education institutions outside the EMI sphere to build international reputations and to prepare graduates for international postgraduate study and competition in global employment markets by adopting English-dominant academic literacy practices, we conclude by reflecting on the question of whether these institutions, in the context of rapid change, are gradually embracing a critical approach to the practices of CT.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have