Screw Thread Configuration Has No Effect on Operative Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The current “gold standard” treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is insertion of a single cannulated screw down the epiphyseal center. Debate remains as to whether partially- (PTCS) or fully-threaded (FTCS) cannulated screws, and what number, are optimal. The present retrospective cohort study compares such constructs in a clinical model. METHODS IRB approval was obtained. Patients (N=158) presenting to a level-one pediatric trauma center for in situ pinning of SCFE between January 2005 and April 2018 were included. Covariates analyzed were sex, race, BMI, history of endocrinopathy, and preoperative designation of unstable SCFE. Outcomes included return to the operating room (OR), avascular necrosis (AVN), hardware failure/removal, and the sequelae of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Multivariable logistic regression models included covariates with significant univariate effects, as well as thread configuration, number of screws, preoperative instability, and the screw*thread and screw*instability interactions. RESULTS Average patient age at surgery was 12.3±1.9 years; 63% of patients were male; 68% of patients were White/Caucasian and the remaining 32% were Black/African American. Mean BMI was 28.4±6.4 kg∙m-2. PTCS were utilized in 81.0% of constructs and 1 screw was placed in 83.5% of hips. Outcome rates were as follows: return to OR=15.8%, AVN=7.6%, FAI=7.0%, hardware failure/removal=9.5%. Univariate modeling demonstrated no significant covariate effects on return to OR (each P≥0.181) or AVN (each P≥0.099). Sex had a significant effect on FAI (P=0.012). Age and bilateral SCFE were significantly related to hardware failure/removal (P=0.039 and P=0.015, respectively). Multivariable models found that 2 screw constructs were associated with increased odds of return to OR [P=0.027; OR=3.01 (1.13-7.98)]. Odds of AVN were increased by older age (P=0.024; OR=1.45 [1.03-2.03]) and 2 screw constructs in stable SCFE [screws*stability interaction: P<0.001; OR=60.5 (5.60-652.31)]. Female sex increased odds of FAI (P=0.012; OR=5.17 [1.31-20.36]). Finally, odds of hardware failure/removal were increased by 2 screw constructs [P=0.038; OR=3.64 (1.13-11.70)] and bilateral SCFE [P=0.027; OR=3.51 (1.15-10.74)]. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION A single, PTCS comprises the majority of SCFE constructs, and this construct carries the least risk for negative outcomes in cases of stable SCFE. These data demonstrate no significant effects of thread configuration on outcomes. The authors caution orthopaedic surgery providers against using more than one screw in cases of stable SCFE, as well as to monitor older, female, and/or bilateral SCFE patients more closely due to an increased risk for complications.