Abstract
Purpose To prospectively measure the scotopic pupil diameter in a normal population and to compare 2 infrared pupillometers for these measurements. Setting Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Department of Ophthalmology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Methods The Colvard infrared pupillometer was compared to the Video Vision Analyzer (VIVA) infrared pupillometer under scotopic light conditions in 33 participants (aged 19 to 55 years). Reliability was assessed by 2 independent examiners (E1, E2). Statistical analysis was performed using a comparison method by Bland and Altman. Results Mean pupil diameter was 6.16 mm ± 1.20 (SD) (range 3.20 to 9.00 mm) with all measurements taken under scotopic illumination. The mean scotopic pupil diameter was 6.08 ± 1.16 mm (range 3.2 to 8.4 mm) with the Colvard pupillometer and 6.24 ± 1.28 mm (3.5 to 9.0 mm) with the VIVA pupillometer. The mean differences between the Colvard and VIVA were −0.27 mm (E1) and −0.05 mm (E2). Limits of agreement ranged from 1.4 (Colvard) to 2.4 (VIVA). The coefficients of repeatability ranged from 0.7 (Colvard) to 1.1 (VIVA). Conclusions A mean scotopic pupil diameter of 6.15 mm with a maximal pupil size of 9.00 mm can be expected in a normal population; this should be considered in refractive corneal and refractive lens surgery. Measurements with the Colvard pupillometer were more reliable and precise than those with the VIVA pupillometer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.