Abstract
An attempt is proposed to overcome the tough opposition of the sciences and humanities. Both types of scientific knowledge have been realized in three ways of their presentation: factual descriptions, establishment of deterministic dependencies and the target context. Such a common platform allows us to specify their interaction. Thus, the results of psychophysiology studies of the brain demonstrate the potential of humanitarian concepts (narratives, memory, self-awareness, freedom), which allows us to clarify the possibilities of interdisciplinary research and the “convergence” of humanitarian and natural-scientific knowledge in technological applications.
Highlights
Однако, перефразируя известный афоризм Марка Твена, слухи о противоположности и даже противостоянии science и humanities сильно преувеличены
The results of psychophysiology studies of the brain demonstrate the potential of humanitarian concepts, which allows us to clarify the possibilities of interdisciplinary research and the “convergence” of humanitarian and natural-scientific knowledge in technological applications
The results of psychophysiology studies of the brain demonstrate the potential of humanitarian concepts (narratives, memory, self-awareness, freedom), which allows us to clarify the possibilities of interdisciplinary research and the “convergence” of humanitarian and natural-scientific knowledge in technological applications
Summary
Перефразируя известный афоризм Марка Твена, слухи о противоположности и даже противостоянии science и humanities сильно преувеличены. Хотя второй дискурс более свойствен science, тогда как третий – humanities, они взаимосвязаны. Роль третьего дискурса проявляется при отборе фактов, их распознавании, в обосновании целей, актуальности исследований, их практической значимости.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
