Abstract

This paper explores the potential of university-industry technology transfer through science-based entrepreneurship education (SBEE). The scientific literature focuses mostly on enabling university-industry technology transfer via university-industry collaboration in research, and not so much in (science) education. The paper identifies four strands of relevant literature for further theorizing SBEE principles to research its contribution to industry-technology transfer: 1. Embedding entrepreneurship education in universities; 2. Balancing theory and practice of entrepreneurship education; 3. Cultivating an entrepreneurial mindset through entrepreneurship education; and 4. Creating spin-offs through entrepreneurship education. One of the main theoretical contributions of this paper is, that SBEE is different from regular entrepreneurship education in its need for being firmly embedded in a science, technology and R&D environment, both within and outside the university. This is important in order to give SBEE students the opportunity to gain experience with handling the hurdles for successful university-industry technology transfer. The main empirical finding is that elements in the program, related to for example the balance between teaching entrepreneurship through theory and experiential learning, are not systematically covered. It means that fundamental questions such as: Can entrepreneurship be indeed taught? Which elements of entrepreneurship can be taught through theory, and which ones must be experienced in practice? are currently left unanswered. Systematic coverage of these questions enables a better exploitation of the possibilities that SBEE offers for university-industry technology transfer.

Highlights

  • University-industry technology transfer has long been perceived as the holy grail in science and innovation policy

  • We develop four analytical categories based upon the literature review, to systematically explore the potential of science-based entrepreneurship education (SBEE) as a means for university-industry technology transfer

  • The case study shows that all elements mentioned in the literature on technology based entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education are present in the case studied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

University-industry technology transfer has long been perceived as the holy grail in science and innovation policy. Innovation policies often implicitly assume, that a lack of university-industry technology transfer is related to a lack of collaboration between scientists and external parties. Anderson et al (2007) question the efficiency of university-industry technology transfer through current organizational arrangements such as Technology Transfer Offices. Problems with university-industry technology transfer have more underlying causes than this single one. They develop a model to quantitatively assess the efficiency of such transfers through current organizational arrangements. They develop a model to quantitatively assess the efficiency of such transfers through current organizational arrangements. Audretsch et al (2005) discuss the role of firm location for university-industry technology transfer

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call