Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNewer AreasScience and TechnologyGeorge WiseGeorge Wise Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 1, Number 11985Historical Writing on American Science Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368647 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 39Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Leszek A. Dobrzański, Lech B. Dobrzański Approach to the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations According to the Rules of Industry 4.0, Materials Performance and Characterization 9, no.11 (Aug 2020): 20200020.https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20200020Panu Nykänen Research and Development in the Finnish Wood Processing and Paper Industry, c. 1850–1990, (Oct 2018): 35–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94962-8_3César García-Díaz, Camilo Olaya Introduction, (Oct 2017): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118974414.ch0Paul Lucier Commercial Science, (Mar 2016): 268–281.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118620762.ch19Benoît Godin Models of innovation: Why models of innovation are models, or what work is being done in calling them models?, Social Studies of Science 45, no.44 (Aug 2015): 570–596.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715596852Stephen Frezza, David Nordquest, Richard Moodey Knowledge-generation epistemology and the foundations of engineering, (Oct 2013): 818–824.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684940Benoit Godin, Joseph P. Lane Pushes and Pulls, Science, Technology, & Human Values 38, no.55 (Sep 2013): 621–654.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912473163Debasmita Patra Nanoscience, nanotechnology, or nanotechnoscience: Perceptions of Indian nanoresearchers, Public Understanding of Science 22, no.55 (Aug 2011): 590–605.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511413977P. Dyachkina, K. Puzanova, Anton Smolkin, Pavel Stepantsov (Critical Analysis and Redesign of the Linear Models and Diffuse the Study of the Dynamics of Innovation), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2345895Torsten Wilholt, Hans Glimell Conditions of Science: The Three-Way Tension of Freedom, Accountability and Utility, (Nov 2010): 351–370.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_21Roel Wieringa Relevance and Problem Choice in Design Science, (Jan 2010): 61–76.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_5John Alphonse, Ole Hanseth Knowledge, Technology and Fluids-Developing a Model to View Practices of Knowledge and Technology in the Telecom Industry, (Jan 2010): 43–50.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB-GMR.2010.52Wybo Houkes The Nature of Technological Knowledge, (Jan 2009): 309–350.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50016-1Chris Hinds The case against a positivist philosophy of requirements engineering, Requirements Engineering 13, no.44 (Sep 2008): 315–328.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-008-0061-9Roel Wieringa, Hans Heerkens Design Science, Engineering Science and Requirements Engineering, (Sep 2008): 310–313.https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2008.63Paul Forman The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology, History and Technology 23, no.1-21-2 (Mar 2007): 1–152.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341510601092191 Designing Requirements Engineering Research, (Jan 2007): 36–48.https://doi.org/10.1109/CERE.2007.4Philip Scranton Technology, science and American innovation, Business History 48, no.33 (Aug 2006): 311–331.https://doi.org/10.1080/00076790600791763Carsten Reinhardt, Harm G. Schröter Academia and Industry in Chemistry: The Impact of State Intervention, and the Effects of Cultural Values, Ambix 51, no.22 (Jul 2013): 99–106.https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.2004.51.2.99Ernst Heinrich Hirschel Aeronautical Research and Technology, (Jan 2004): 3–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18484-0_1Ton van Helvoort ?Purifying? Science: E. C. Slater and Postwar Biochemistry in the Netherlands, History of Science 41, no.11 (Jul 2016): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530304100101Benoît Godin Measuring Science: is there “Basic Research” without Statistics?, Social Science Information 42, no.11 (Jun 2016): 57–90.https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018403042001795Govindan Parayil Economics and technological change: An evolutionary epistemological inquiry, Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12, no.11 (Mar 1999): 60–73.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-999-1014-4Sungook Hong Historiographical layers in the relationship between science and technology, History and Technology 15, no.44 (Jan 1999): 289–311.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341519908581950Roger A. Pielke, Radford Byerly Beyond Basic and Applied, Physics Today 51, no.22 (Feb 1998): 42–46.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882141J.S. Metcalfe Science policy and technology policy in a competitive economy, International Journal of Social Economics 24, no.7/8/97/8/9 (Jul 1997): 723–740.https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299710178801Ronald Kline Construing "Technology" as "Applied Science": Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880-1945, Isis 86, no.22 (Oct 2015): 194–221.https://doi.org/10.1086/357153Roger A. Pielke Usable information for policy: An appraisal of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, Policy Sciences 28, no.11 (Jan 1995): 39–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000820Govindan Parayil Economics and technological change: An evolutionary epistemological inquiry, Knowledge and Policy 7, no.11 (Mar 1994): 79–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692817Stuart Shapiro Boundaries and Quandaries: Establishing a Professional Context for IT, Information Technology & People 7, no.11 (Mar 1994): 48–68.https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849410074025Roland W. Schmitt Public Support of Science: Searching for Harmony, Physics Today 47, no.11 (Jan 1994): 29–33.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881437Govindan Parayil Technology as Knowledge, Knowledge 13, no.11 (Aug 2016): 36–48.https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709101300103Govindan Parayil Technological knowledge and technological change, Technology in Society 13, no.33 (Jan 1991): 289–304.https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(91)90005-HR Florida, M Kenney High-Technology Restructuring in the USA and Japan, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 22, no.22 (Jul 2016): 233–252.https://doi.org/10.1068/a220233 Ellis W. Hawley , Robert E. Kohler , and Nathan Reingold Government Science, Isis 78, no.44 (Oct 2015): 576–589.https://doi.org/10.1086/354555Paolo Palladino Science for whom? Agricultural development and the theory of induced innovation, Agriculture and Human Values 4, no.2-32-3 (Mar 1987): 53–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530642Duncan MacRae Building Policy-Related Technical Communities, Knowledge 8, no.33 (Aug 2016): 431–462.https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708700800302 Current Periodical Literature, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 5, no.44 (Jul 2016): 385–406.https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768500500408Benjamin K. Sovacool, Marilyn A. Brown Introduction – The Compelling Tangle of Energy and American Society, (): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5564-1_1

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.