Abstract

Purpose The conceptual root of vulnerability dates back to the 1970s in the social science spheres. Vulnerability is a multi-dimensional and determinant precondition for disaster occurrence. The Gamo lowlands are exposed to a wide range of vulnerabilities. Therefore, this study aims to schematize community perceptions and understanding of vulnerability in drought-affected rural Gamo lowlands. Design/methodology/approach A community-based cross-sectional survey design and the mixed-methods research approach were executed. A four-staged multistage sampling was used to identify the respondent households. Into the four study sites, sample households were allocated proportionally by the lottery method. The survey data were gathered from 285 lowland households. The structured survey questionnaire, key informant interview, focus group discussion, and field observations, and transect walks were the tools used to collect the primary data. Data were analyzed deploying both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The Likert scale is used to analyze households’ vulnerability perceptions in which the item analysis approach was used for detailed analysis of the Likert-type items. Findings Locally, people perceive and understand vulnerability as exposure to drought hazard, rainfall inconsistency, the prevalence of human and animal diseases, livelihood insecurity, food shortfalls, poor income, lack of access to market, landholding and livestock ownership which are schematized by vulnerability perception pathways that delineate its extent. The findings also showed that the Gamo lowland inhabitants are unequally vulnerable as 96.5% of the studied households stated the differential idiosyncrasy of vulnerability. Old-aged, small-sized and female-headed households with no supportive force were found to be more vulnerable. Practical implications For better resilience, enhancing communities’ perceptions and understanding of vulnerability via continuous awareness creation by all the concerned stakeholders is recommended as the majority was lowly educated. It also yields input for policy debates and decision-making in the drought-prone lowland setup for building a resilient community. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is an original work pursued by using a household survey with empirical data sourced from drought-prone rural lowland communities.

Highlights

  • The findings showed that the Gamo lowland inhabitants are unequally vulnerable as 96.5% of the studied households stated the differential idiosyncrasy of vulnerability

  • Vulnerability is originated from the Latin term “vulnus” meaning wound (Slater, 2016; Wisner, 2016)

  • Since the 1980s, such a hazard-oriented understanding is shifted to a vulnerability-focused paradigm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vulnerability is originated from the Latin term “vulnus (vulner)” meaning wound (Slater, 2016; Wisner, 2016). Since the 1980s, such a hazard-oriented understanding is shifted to a vulnerability-focused paradigm. The shift followed the technically intervening challenges against the hazard-oriented views (Schneiderbauer and Ehrlich, 2004). This new paradigm in emergency management is advanced by the proponents as a core theme in the introduction of vulnerability connotation. This is found helpful in better capturing and perception of disasters’ social construction (McEntire et al, 2010). Others acknowledged that vulnerability is a word accredited by multiple denotations across disciplines Ciurean et al (2013) with a defied consent on the meaning (Sterlacchini, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call