Abstract

RCS reconstruction is an important way to reduce the measurement time in anechoic chambers and expand the radar original data, which can solve the problems of data scarcity and a high measurement cost. The greedy pursuit, convex relaxation, and sparse Bayesian learning-based sparse recovery methods can be used for parameter estimation. However, these sparse recovery methods either have problems in solving accuracy or selecting auxiliary parameters, or need to determine the probability distribution of noise in advance. To solve these problems, a non-parametric Sparse Iterative Covariance Estimation (SPICE) algorithm with global convergence property based on the sparse Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD) model (GTD–SPICE) is employed for the first time for RCS reconstruction. Furthermore, an improved coarse-to-fine two-stage SPICE method (DE–GTD–SPICE) based on the Damped Exponential (DE) model and the GTD model (DE–GTD) is proposed to reduce the computational cost. Experimental results show that both the GTD–SPICE method and the DE–GTD–SPICE method are reliable and effective for RCS reconstruction. Specifically, the DE–GTD–SPICE method has a shorter computational time.

Highlights

  • Witold Kazimierski andRadar cross section (RCS) is a physical quantity to measure the scattering ability of radar targets [1]

  • Method, the Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD)–IRLS method and the GTD–CVX method are included in the following experiments

  • A random frequency-hopping pattern combined with RCS reconstruction is utilized to reduce the time of the coherent stepped frequency scattering measurement in anechoic chambers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radar cross section (RCS) is a physical quantity to measure the scattering ability of radar targets [1]. After the processing of RCS data, the scattering distribution and status information of targets can be obtained, such as radar SAR/ISAR imaging [2,3] and radar automatic target recognition [4,5,6], etc. The main methods to obtain RCS data include electromagnetic calculation in software, a scattering measurement in anechoic chambers, and a scattering measurement in an open area test site (OATS), under far-field conditions. The RCS data measured in anechoic chambers has a lower cost than in an OATS, and has higher data authenticity than by electromagnetic calculation in software

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.