Abstract

A particle scale model based on a full two-way coupling of the Discrete Element Method (DEM) and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPHs) methods is applied to SAG mills. Motion and collisions of resolved coarser particles within an SAG mill are performed by the DEM component. Fine particles in the feed combine with the water to form a slurry, which is represented by the SPH component of the model. Slurry rheology is controlled by solid loading and fine particle size distribution for each volume of slurry. Transport, dispersion, and grinding of the slurry phase particle size distribution are predicted by solving additional coupled advection–diffusion equations in the SPH component of the model. Grinding of the finer particles in the slurry due to collisions and shear of the coarser particles (rocks and grinding media) is achieved via the inclusion of population balance terms in these equations for each SPH particle. This allows prediction of the transport of both coarser and finer material within the grinding and pulp chambers of an SAG mill, including the discharge performance of the mill. This particle-scale model is used to investigate the relative performance (throughput, product size distribution, resident particle size distribution, net power draw, wear) for an SAG mill at a pilot scale and a 36 ft industrial scale. The 36′ SAG mill considered is a geometrically scaled-up version of the 1.8 m Hardinge pilot scale mill but with a longer belly length, reflecting current SAG mill design preferences. The belly lifters are scaled to a lesser degree with a larger number of lifters used (but still many fewer liners than would typically be used in a large SAG mill based on conventional liner selection rules). The model shows that despite reasonable qualitative similarities, many aspects of the charge structure, slurry transport, coarse particle and slurry discharge through the grates, and the collision energy spectra vary in important ways. This demonstrates that a near purely geometric scale-up of an SAG mill is not sufficient to produce a comparable performance at the two physical mill scales.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call