Abstract

Dimensionality reduction aims at representing high-dimensional data in low-dimensional spaces, in order to facilitate their visual interpretation. Many techniques exist, ranging from simple linear projections to more complex nonlinear transformations. The large variety of methods emphasizes the need of quality criteria that allow for fair comparisons between them. This paper extends previous work about rank-based quality criteria and proposes to circumvent their scale dependency. Most dimensionality reduction techniques indeed rely on a scale parameter that distinguish between local and global data properties. Such a scale dependency can be similarly found in usual quality criteria: they assess the embedding quality on a certain scale. Experiments with various dimensionality reduction techniques eventually show the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed scale-independent criteria.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.