Abstract

People living with HIV (PLHIV) experience greater loss of muscle mass and function than people without HIV. However, HIV is not routinely recognized as a sarcopenia risk factor outside of HIV literature. The purposes of this study were to establish the prevalence and predictors of sarcopenia among PLHIV, and to compare the prevalence of sarcopenia among PLHIV and people without HIV. A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and Scielo databases was performed following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Identified articles were included if they evaluated sarcopenia among PLHIV using either the presence of low muscle mass only or low muscle mass in association with low muscle function. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia among PLHIV and the odds ratio for sarcopenia in PLHIV compared with controls were calculated. From 13 studies and 2267 participants, the prevalence of sarcopenia among PLHIV was 24.1% (95% CI = 17.8-31.0%). PLHIV presented 6.1 greater odds (95% CI = 1.1-33.5) of sarcopenia compared with people without HIV, matched by age, sex, BMI, and ethnicity. Longer exposure to specific HIV drugs, tobacco and alcohol, lower education and employment rates, and greater HIV duration were associated with sarcopenia. In conclusion, PLHIV had a high prevalence of sarcopenia, related to both HIV and non-HIV risk factors. HIV should be considered a risk factor for sarcopenia in the general population. CRD42019131449.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.