Abstract
The impact of testing locations, home use test (HUT) and central location test (CLT) on consumer evaluations of food products using rate all that apply (RATA) was investigated. As a case study, eight cold cuts were evaluated: four vegetarian/vegan and four meat-based products. A between-subjects design was used, whereby consumers were randomly allocated to either HUT or CLT test location (58 and 71 consumers, respectively). To retain as much similarity as possible across locations, consumers in both groups received identical bags of products with palate cleansers and instructions. Consumers evaluated the products using a lexicon consisting of 32 sensory attributes based on similar studies and benchtop tasting, using RATA with 7pt scales. A total of 30 and 31 attributes differed significantly (p < 0.05) across the products for HUT and CLT, respectively. Sample discrimination was similar between the two locations. Location significantly (p < 0.05) affected discrimination of 14 attributes, but a particular location having consistently higher attribute means was not observed. Bootstrapping of the attribute means per product showed no significant differences between the two testing locations, and multilevel regression models using Bayesian inference did not reveal marked differences in expected ratings between locations. Further comparisons of sample discrimination patterns through principal component analysis showed that the two locations were very similar, including the overlap of confidence ellipses. The between-subjects design strengthens the results: that comparable sensory profiles were obtained from different consumers in different testing locations supports the notion that RATA data from consumers can be reliably collected for relatively sensorially distinct products with minimal data compromise.
Highlights
The COVID-19 global pandemic during the year 2020 has changed how we live as a society
The results of the current study showed that rate all that apply (RATA) profiles are stable across testing locations at the consumer group level
Hedonics can be affected by testing location and context (Bastian, Danner, Niimi, Ristic, & Johnson, 2019; Stelick & Dando, 2018), consumers could adequately profile the sensory characteristics of cold cuts regardless of test location
Summary
The COVID-19 global pandemic during the year 2020 has changed how we live as a society. Sensory studies do not always necessarily need to be conducted as a central location test (CLT), instead data can be collected from consumers at home. Clustering patterns within CLT and HUT by liking of products can vary, shown through a between-subjects design (Zhang, Jo, Lopetcharat, & Drake, 2020). These results are akin to context effects, where consumer responses can differ between testing in the laboratory, evoked consumption context through imagi nation whilst being in a laboratory, real life situation (be it a bar, restaurant, as well as at home), and virtual reality (Lichters, Moslein, Sarstedt, & Scharf, 2021; Sinesio et al, 2021)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.