Abstract

Consumer tests are classified in terms of the location of testing as laboratory tests or central location tests (CLTs) and home use tests (HUTs). CLT is generally used in sensory tests due to the ease of test control, whereas HUT has higher validity because of real consumption. However, the lack of test control in HUT is a major issue. In order to investigate the error occurrence and efforts required to minimize errors, three groups of tests were designed differing time and order control and evaluation was conducted using six snacks with texture differences. Errors related to time, order, and consumer or sample number were higher for more controlled conditions, however, most errors were recoverable using identification information except for cases of no response. Additionally, consumers preferred to consume all snacks in the evening at home, which differed from the typical 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. evaluation time in CLT. However, the timing differed for consumers with self-reported snacking time. The research title that included the term ‘home’ might have influenced the participants’ choice of location for evaluation. Overall, there was no significant difference between the results of groups despite different time and order controls, which could increase the applicability of HUT.

Highlights

  • Acceptance tests are crucial for food companies as acceptability can be used as an estimation for the possible repurchase of products by customers

  • Consumer acceptance tests are largely divided into laboratory tests or central location tests (CLT) and home use tests (HUT)

  • HUT is conducted at home where the consumers can evaluate in natural circumstances, it is one of the most noticeable methods to measure acceptability in real consumption

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acceptance tests are crucial for food companies as acceptability can be used as an estimation for the possible repurchase of products by customers. HUT is conducted at home where the consumers can evaluate in natural circumstances, it is one of the most noticeable methods to measure acceptability in real consumption. The biggest challenge of HUT is control, as the evaluation is autonomous and is influenced by external factors such as evaluation of an uncertain amount of sample, improper focus, and interference of other family members’ during evaluation In this respect, several comparative studies between CLT and HUT have been done as the context effect suggests that the results would be different depending on the test location [4,5,8,9,10].

Samples
Test Design
Questionnaire
Data Analysis
Checking of Errors and Analyzable Data
Evaluation Time and Place
Consumer’s Liking and Perceived Intensity of Samples
Purchase Intent and Price Willing to Pay
Correspondence Analysis of Texture Characteristics
Analysis of Portion Size by Consumers
Suggestions for the Home Use Test and Limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call