Abstract
The system for classifying vegetation types currently used in Swedish forestry has two major deficiencies when identifying reindeer winter pastures: it uses lichen cover as the sole criterion for defining them, and it ignores the possible adverse effects of snow cover. Based on ethnological field studies, this paper examines Sami reindeer herders' classification of reindeer winter pastures, and compares it to the system used by foresters at different levels of classification. At the lower level, which deals with identifying discrete entities, it is possible to find some correspondence between the representations of forest characteristics used by the Sami herders and the foresters. Reindeer herders discriminate the same factors – tree height, canopy enclosure, stem density, field-layer, bottom-layer – as forest manager, but the former use this knowledge to evaluate the effects on snow cover and ice, and thus on the accessibility of the lichen beneath. Inconsistencies appear at the second level of classification, which consists in ordering this variety of forest characteristics into a classificatory system. There is a mismatch between Sami herders and forester’s representations and classifications of pastures because Sami categories are ‘complex’, i.e. categories including many criteria that have to be combined and balanced before defining the pasture. Herders’ representation of pasture is thus holistic, rather than purely botanical. The comparison of the two classification systems demonstrates that it is impossible to define grazing quality solely in terms of lichen abundance, because of the multidimensional nature of reindeer winter pastures and consequent shifts (spatial and temporal) in its quality.
Highlights
In the course of my studies (Roturier, 2009) on the restoration of lichen-dominated pine forests that has been disturbed by modern forestry, questions arose regarding the forest types or the final ecosystem state that should be targeted in restoration programmes
This paper provides insights into Sami herders’ categories of reindeer winter pastures, and clarifies inconsistencies between the classifications used by Sami herders and Swedish foresters
Reindeer winter pastures are dependent of a variety of factors – tree height, canopy enclosure, stem density, field-layer, bottom-layer – and the identification of these factors are somewhat similar to Sami and foresters
Summary
In the course of my studies (Roturier, 2009) on the restoration of lichen-dominated pine forests that has been disturbed by modern forestry, questions arose regarding the forest types or the final ecosystem state that should be targeted in restoration programmes. Within the framework of ethnoscience the analysis of the different stages of the process in the case of reindeer winter pasture can be used to study Sami reindeer herders’ knowledge of their milieu, and to compare folk and scientific representations and classifications of the same natural objects.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have