Abstract
Abdominal adiposity has been described as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Sagittal abdominal diameter has been found to be closely related to the amount of visceral adipose tissue. To compare the sagittal abdominal diameter with other anthropometric measures regarding their relationships to risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). A study of 885 men and women participating in a health survey. Sagittal abdominal diameter, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, serum concentrations of risk factors for CHD, blood pressure. In men the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to the CHD risk factors serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, apolipoprotein B (apoB), plasminogen activator inhibitor tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and lipid-corrected alpha tocopherol, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressures than the other anthropometric measurements. In women, compared with the other anthropometric measurements the sagittal abdominal diameter was more strongly correlated to serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL (high-density lipoprotein), apo B and t-PA, and to systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The sagittal abdominal diameter showed a stronger correlation to 'total risk' for cardiovascular disease (+ 0.66 for men, 0.62 for women), than waist circumference (+ 0.63 for men, + 0.57 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.61 for men and +0.48 for women; P <0.0001 for all correlations). This diameter was also more strongly correlated to 'metabolic risk' (+ 0.64 for men, + 0.59 for women) than waist circumference (+ 0.60 for men, + 0.59 for women) and waist-to-hip ratio (+ 0.58 for men, + 0.52 for women)(P < 0.0001 for all correlations). In a regression analysis including the anthropometric measurements and the risk values, the sagittal diameter was the strongest measure of cardiovascular risk in both men and women. Among both men and women in this study the sagittal abdominal diameter showed stronger correlations to cardiovascular risk and to other risk factors in the metabolic syndrome than other anthropometric variables such as waist circumference, waist-to hip ratio and BMI.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
