Abstract

Different conceptions of crime in design practice, sociology, environmental psychology, and crimi- nology indicate an extensive articulation of crime in relation to the built environment and urban form in the city. Five decades of different studies on urban crime, crime prevention through environmental design, and fear of crime indicate an implicit and gradual movement from deterministic to possibilistic propositions in exploring the relationships between urban crime and environmental design both in theory and practice. Hence, the study firstly conducts a critical review on the issue of urban crime in relation to urban design, planning, and architecture disciplines. Categorizing different researches of urban crime in terms of their propositions and various dimensions of crime prevention through environmental design, the study proceeds to discuss the issue of crime in relation to spatiality and sociality in the city. Moreover, grounding the issue of safety in the context of place theory and avoiding deterministic and free-will approaches to urban crime, the study advocates for the necessity of mapping urban morphology, functional attributes, and spatial patterns in relation to socio-economic condition and demographic profiling. Thus, giving primacy to spatiality in relation to sociality and criticizing the absence of morphological mapping of urban crime, the study denotes the multi-scalar and multi-dimensional attributes of urban crime in relation to morphological, functional, perceptual, and social dimensions of a safe place by design.

Highlights

  • Considering the large body of knowledge and research on the issue of crime in relation to the built environmentHow to cite this paper: Kamalipour, H., Faizi, M., & Memarian, G. (2014)

  • Despite the fact that crime is one of the critical problems of cities worldwide (Marzbali, Abdullah, Razak, & Tilaki, 2012b), most of the previous studies have been conducted in sociology, criminology, and psychology in order to either explore the sociocultural and economic predictors of crime, whether in sociocultural context or individuals, or evaluate the proposed theories or propositions

  • Whilst planners and designers need to adopt theories and propositions in relation to spatiality and sociality domains in order to forecast the social outcomes of their spatial amendments in the built environment, the efficiency of these propositions remains ambiguous while societies are paying the price and the challenge is overwhelmingly critical when “design-level” theories are needed for interventions (Hillier, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How to cite this paper: Kamalipour, H., Faizi, M., & Memarian, G. (2014). Safe Place by Design: Urban Crime in Relation to Spatiality and Sociality. Conducting an analytical review, the study advocates for the critical role of spatial structure and urban morphology in crime prevention through environmental design and fear of crime in the city. Despite of the considerable body of knowledge on critical role of safety in the city, most of the planners, urban designers, and architects make decisions based on a partial or inadequate knowledge on attractors, generators, and patterns of crime that might lead to increasing the possibility of crime occurrence The issue of safety in the city and safe place in design-level interventions and decision-making process need to be addressed through multidisciplinary approaches including sociology, criminology, environmental psychology, planning, urban design, and architecture in order to cover different dimensions of the problem both in theory and practice

Urban Crime
Safety by Design
A Safe Place
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call