Abstract

Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is strongly linked to insulin resistance. As a result, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is commonly comorbid in NAFLD and can increase morbidity and reduce weight loss treatment efficacy. We studied weight loss in adult NAFLD patients without and with T2DM (NAFLD-DM) receiving care in the Yale Fatty Liver Disease Program (YFLDP), which focuses on the integration of medical weight management treatments and hepatology care. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data for adult patients with diagnostic codes for NAFLD and T2DM with complete data on body weight and at least one clinic visit between 5/23/2018 and 5/02/2022. Patients were categorized as NAFLD or NAFLD-DM. Total body weight loss (WL) was quantified using 0%, 5%, and 10% thresholds. Between NAFLD and NAFLD-DM groups, we compared total body weight loss (WL) and across WL threshold groups, we also compared initial weights, follow-up time, medical interventions received, and results of non-invasive liver fibrosis tests. Results: There were 933 patients with NAFLD, of whom 463 (49.6%) had NAFLD-DM. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months, 632 (67.7%) of all patients achieved any weight loss. Significantly more patients with NAFLD-DM lost weight compared to NAFLD alone (73.9 vs 61.7%, p< 0.0001). Weight loss between NAFLD and NAFLD-DM groups varied, respectively: 0-5% WL: 34.7% vs. 34.8% (p=0.98); 5-10% WL: 13.2% vs. 19.2% (p=0.01), >10% WL: 13.8% vs. 19.9% (p=0.01). Compared to those not losing weight, NAFLD and NAFLD-DM patients with >10% WL had significantly greater proportion of participation in a complete meal replacement program (Optifast®) or treatment with GLP-1 agonist semaglutide. For NAFLD and NAFLD-DM groups, there was no significant difference between initial Fibroscan stiffness or FIB-4 index and subsequent WL percentages (Table). Conclusion: The majority of NAFLD and NAFLD-DM patients receiving care in a specialty clinic incorporating medical weight management with liver care successfully achieved weight loss in a relatively short period. Patients with NAFLD-DM did not have significantly worse outcomes with weight loss, and NAFLD-T2DM patients lost more weight than NAFLD patients. These findings suggest that an integrative care liver clinic with concurrent weight management care can help patients improve metabolic diseases associated with NAFLD, particularly T2DM, and in turn improve liver-related outcomes.Figure 1.: Comparison of Clinic Interventions between No Weight Loss (WL) versus >10% WL patients with NAFLD (top panel, a) and NAFLD-DM (bottom panel, b). *Statistically significant p-values using chi-square analysis, which can be found in Table Table 1. - Characteristics of and Clinical Interventions for NAFLD and NAFLD-DM Patients in the Yale Fatty Liver Disease Program (YFLDP). There was a significantly lower proportion of patients with NAFLD compared to NAFLD-DM who were able to achieve > 10% Weight Loss (13.8 vs. 19.9, p=0.014), and significantly more NAFLD patients compared to NAFLD-DM who did not achieve any weight loss (38.3 vs. 26.1, p<0.001) NAFLD (n=470 patients) NAFLD-DM (n=463 patients) Patient Categories n (%) No WL180 (38.3) >10% WL65 (13.8) p No WL121 (26.1) >10% WL92 (19.9) p Clinic Interventions n (%) Nutrition Consultation 80 (44.4) 31 (47.7) 0.652 58 (47.9) 40 (43.5) 0.518 OPTIFAST® Program 4 (2.2) 5 (7.7) 0.045 2 (1.7) 8 (8.7) 0.016 Naltrexone/Buproprion 6 (3.3) 5 (7.7) 0.146 16 (13.2) 6 (6.5) 0.111 Semaglutide 15 (8.3) 17 (26.2) < 0.001 30 (24.8) 37 (40.2) 0.016 Liraglutide 11 (6.1) 7 (10.8) 0.217 21 (17.4) 7 (7.6) 0.037 Phentermine 9 (5.0) 10 (15.4) 0.007 15 (12.4) 17 (18.5) 0.219 Bariatric Surgery Referral 13 (7.2) 5 (7.7) 0.901 21 (17.4) 31 (33.7) 0.006 Health Outcomes mean (SD) Follow-Up Time, days 256 (276.5) 422 (296.8) < 0.001 271 (280.2) 403 (297.3) 0.001 Initial FibroScan® Stiffness, kPa 8.63 (6.72) 13.18 (14.01) 0.663 13.18 (14.01) 12.48 (12.49) 0.701 Initial FIB-4 Score 1.32 (1.13) 1.70 (1.98) 0.068 1.70 (1.98) 1.83 (2.11) 0.648 Initial Weight, kg 93.82 (25.45) 102.20 (24.90) 0.015 102.20 (24.90) 109.61 (25.07) 0.056 *Denotes statistical significance p<0.05. WL = Weight Loss.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.