Abstract

In an IASLC memorial earlier this year, Dr. Gazdar was very appropriately described as “a true giant in the field of lung cancer.” Dr. Gazdar’s profound impact on our field continues to be felt both in the clinic and at the bench. As a world-renowned molecular and clinical pathologist, he played a key role in setting the standards for classifying human lung cancers. As a scientist, he established ∼400 human cancer cell lines. These included a large number of molecularly-annotated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines that have led to countless, practice-changing biological discoveries. As a founding-father of lung cancer research, he had a remarkable depth of knowledge in lung cancer biology and pathology. He shared his expertise through hundreds of publications. However, he also gave generously of himself (and his knowledge) to collaborators and mentees – serving as an advisor and teacher to almost everyone in the field who had the opportunity to be around him. Having contributed to key discoveries over five decades, Dr. Gazdar intuitively understood which new developments were likely to make the biggest impact and what questions we should be asking next. This was especially true for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other neuroendocrine tumors, where despite years of research there had been relatively few advances in the clinic. In a review published a year before his death, Dr. Gazdar and his co-authors shared their excitement for the recent worldwide resurgence of SCLC research – which they describe as “The Second Golden Age” of SCLC research.1 Several new developments in SCLC and neuroendocrine tumors have contributed to a better understanding of the disease and have shown promise for translational application. These include the discovery of (1) significant heterogeneity between patients with SCLC, (2) the plasticity of SCLC over time, (3) the role of intra-tumoral heterogeneity in metastasis and resistance, and (4) the identification of new therapeutic targets, immunotherapy approaches, and candidate biomarkers for SCLC. Going forward, opportunities and unmet needs in SCLC include enrolling patients onto clinical trials that can identify therapeutic vulnerabilities among specific SCLC subtypes; deeply profiling relapsed SCLC (through new models and patient specimen profiling); and extending our understanding of the immune microenvironment in SCLC. Given the pace and impact of recent discoveries in SCLC, it is no surprise that Dr. Gazdar and his co-authors concluded that “…while the past has been bleak, the future offers great promise.” 1. Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, Minna JD. Small-cell lung cancer: what we know, what we need to know and the path forward. Nat Rev Cancer 2017;17:725-37. Heterogeneity, biomarkers, SCLC

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call