Abstract

As the primary ingredient in gunpowder, saltpeter was an extraordinarily important commodity in the early modern world. Historians of science and technology have long studied its military applications but have rarely focused on its uses outside of warfare. Due to its potential effectiveness as a fertilizer, saltpeter was also an integral component of experimental agricultural reform movements in the early modern period and particularly in seventeenth-century England. This became possible for several reasons: the creation of a thriving domestic saltpeter production industry in the second half of the sixteenth century; the development of vitalist alchemical theories that sought a unified explanation for the "growth" of minerals, metals, and plants; the rise of experimental natural philosophy; and the mid-seventeenth-century dominance of the English East India Company in the saltpeter trade, which allowed agricultural reformers to repurpose domestically produced saltpeter in agriculturally productive ways. This paper argues that the Hartlib Circle - a loose network of natural philosophers and social reformers - adopted vitalist matter theories and the practical, experimental techniques of alchemists to transform agriculture into a more productive enterprise. Though their grandiose plans never came to fruition, their experimental trials to develop artificial fertilizers played an early role in the origins and development of saline chemistry, agronomy, and the British Agricultural Revolution.

Highlights

  • Writing about saltpeter in 1653, alchemist and agriculturist Cheney Culpeper made note of the troubling fact that “the Matter by which men are killed & fedde, is but one & the same, & differs onely in the minde & hande that uses it.”[1]

  • Culpeper posed to Worsley a series of questions, hoping to answer whether the cosmic process that created the vitalizing power of saltpeter might be replicated in the laboratory or on the farm, in order to control the “exilation of the Spirit of Nature againe and againe.”[60]. He related the opinions of several natural philosophers, one of whom was the unnamed author of “Traitte de Sel,” presumably meaning Traittez de l’Harmonie et Consitution generalle du vray sel (Treatise of the Harmony and General Constitution of the True Salt), a plagiarized work published by the Sendivogian alchemist Clovis Hesteau, Sieur de Nuysement but derived entirely from Jean Brouaut’s Trois livres des éléments chymiques et spagyriques.[61]

  • Though observers in the early sixteenth century were clearly aware that saltpeter was connected in some way to soil fertility and plant growth, only in the seventeenth century did natural philosophers, alchemists, and agricultural reformers initiate an experimental regime designed explicitly to determine the source and nature of that vitalizing power

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Writing about saltpeter in 1653, alchemist and agriculturist Cheney Culpeper made note of the troubling fact that “the Matter by which men are killed & fedde, is but one & the same, & differs onely in the minde & hande that uses it.”[1].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call