Abstract

Research Article| May 01, 2013 Rupture to the Trench: Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Jeremy E. Kozdon; Jeremy E. Kozdon Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305jekozdon@nps.edu *Now at Department of Applied Mathematics, Naval Postgraduate School, 833 Dyer Road, Monterey, California 93943. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Eric M. Dunham Eric M. Dunham Department of Geophysics and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305edunham@stanford.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (2B): 1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120136 Article history first online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jeremy E. Kozdon, Eric M. Dunham; Rupture to the Trench: Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2013;; 103 (2B): 1275–1289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120136 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract There is strong evidence that the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake rupture reached the seafloor. This is surprising because the shallow portion of the plate interface in subduction zones is thought to be frictionally stable, leading to the widely held view that coseismic rupture would stop several tens of kilometers downdip of the seafloor. Various explanations have been proposed to reconcile this seeming inconsistency, including dynamic weakening (e.g., thermal pressurization) and extreme stress release around shallow subducted seamounts. We offer a simpler explanation supported by 2D dynamic rupture simulations of the Tohoku earthquake. Our models account for depth‐dependent material properties and the complex geometry of the fault, seafloor, and material interfaces, based on seismic surveys of the Japan Trench. The fault obeys rate‐and‐state friction with standard logarithmic dependence of shear strength on slip velocity in steady state. In our preferred model, the uppermost section of the fault is velocity strengthening. Rupture nucleates on a deeper, velocity‐weakening section. Waves released by deep slip reflect off the seafloor, transmitting large stress changes to the upper section of the fault driving the rupture through the velocity‐strengthening region to the trench. We validate the model against seafloor deformation and 1‐Hz Global Positioning System (GPS) data. The seafloor displacements constrain the seismogenic depth and overall amount of slip, particularly near the trench. Our simulations reproduce many features in the GPS data, thereby providing insight into the rupture process and seismic wave field. Sensitivity to parameters is explored through an extensive suite of simulations. Neither static seafloor deformation nor onshore 1‐HzGPS data can uniquely determine near‐trench frictional properties due to trade‐offs with average stress drop. While conducted specifically for the Japan Trench region, our simulations suggest that rupture to the trench in megathrust events is quite possible, even if velocity‐strengthening properties extend tens of kilometers landward from the trench.Online Material: Mp4 movies of particle velocities. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.