Abstract

The implementation of China’s high-speed railroad network and the “Bridges Instead of Roads” construction concept has raised concerns over earthquake safety. The complex mechanism of near-field ground motions poses greater risks than far-field ground motions due to the rupture directivity effect, and Hanging-wall/Footwall effects. The PEER earthquake database lacks earthquake records with fault distances less than 20 km, making it difficult to study train running safety (TRS) under near-fault ground motions. To address this issue, an empirical formulation method is adopted for near-fault three-dimensional seismic synthesis that considers source and site characteristics as well as rupture directivity effects using regression analysis. The method is verified with respect to directivity pulse and a train-bridge coupled system (TBCS) model is developed to verify its accuracy under earthquakes. Responses of the TBCS model under near-fault ground motions synthesized with different fault types, closest distances to the fault surface, and directivity parameters are analyzed by taking the average of the largest part of the response for comparison. Results show that dip-slip faults pose a greater danger than strike-slip faults, and the main reason for the hazard caused by rupture directivity effects is the generation of a forward directivity pulse, which makes the TBCS highly susceptible to derailment under near-fault pulse-like ground motions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call