Abstract

BackgroundAging populations with increasing frailty have major implications for health services, and evidence-based treatment becomes increasingly important. The development of the electronic Frailty Index (eFI) using routine primary care data facilitatesthe implementation of evidence-based interventions and care.
 MethodOur implementation of the eFI in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank identifies frailty based on 1574 Read codes, which are mapped amongst 36 categories known as deficits. The eFI is based on a cumulative deficitmodel, and each deficit contributes equally to the eFI value.
 FindingsAlthough each deficit is equally weighted, only one is currently time dependent. We therefore analysed the cumulative prevalence of each deficit on a year-by-year basis. This led to the identification of time bounds for particular deficits, which willhelp to refine future implementations of the eFI. We also further validated the eFI using data from over 400,000 individuals held in SAIL.
 ConclusionThe eFI is particularly useful as it uses existing data to identify frailty, meaning no additional resources are required. Furthermore, our implementation is readily available, meaning that future research related to frailty is easily achievable by others.

Highlights

  • Aging populations with increasing frailty have major implications for health services, and evidence-based treatment becomes increasingly important

  • Our implementation of the electronic Frailty Index (eFI) in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank identifies frailty based on 1574 Read codes, which are mapped amongst 36 categories known as deficits

  • We further validated the eFI using data from over 400,000 individuals held in SAIL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aging populations with increasing frailty have major implications for health services, and evidence-based treatment becomes increasingly important. Identifying frailty: Implementing the electronic Frailty Index in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank Hollinghurst, J1*, Akbari, A1, Rodgers, S1, and Clegg, A2

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call