Abstract

Friction originates at the area of real contact which depends on the (changing) surface topography. Observing and measuring the area of real contact at multi-asperity interfaces is difficult, making it challenging to quantitatively study the interplay between the frictional force and surface topography. In this paper, we systematically manipulate surface topography and use a fluorescence microscopy-based contact visualization technique to reveal this interplay. We demonstrate good agreement between elastoplastic boundary element method contact calculations and experimental visualization of the area of real contact. While the area of real contact and thus contact pressure could be varied by a factor of 4 through control of the surface topography, this had only a modest effect on the coefficient of friction (CoF). We do find a small but systematic increase in the proportionality constant between frictional force and normal force (CoF) with decreasing surface roughness. The observation that smoother surfaces have a greater CoF is due to capillary adhesion between the two surfaces. We quantitatively model this behavior using a simple capillary adhesion model without adjustable parameters. Our results provide quantitative insights into the interplay between contact mechanics, friction, and capillary adhesion. A predictive understanding of this interplay is essential to demanding applications such as precision positioning.

Highlights

  • Friction is one of the most common natural phenomena

  • The parameters that go into our model are not adjustable; the topography is measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM), the boundary element method (BEM) contact calculations are based on the elastoplastic properties of Si3N4 and sapphire, and the capillary adhesion range and Laplace pressure are estimated based on the Kelvin-Tolman equation and based on previous measurements [35]

  • We demonstrated that the Si3N4-on-sapphire frictional force is not proportional to the area of real contact; the coefficient of friction (CoF) reflects a proportionality between normal stress and shear stress

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Friction is one of the most common natural phenomena. Around 2 million years ago, in the Middle Paleolithic period, our ancestors used the phenomenon to make fire [1]. Observing and measuring the area of real contact at multi-asperity interfaces is difficult, making it challenging to quantitatively study the interplay between the frictional force and surface topography.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call