Abstract
Algorithms for treatment of diffuse bleeding in cardiac surgery are based on intervention thresholds of coagulation tests, such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) or conventional laboratory tests. The relationship between these two approaches is unclear in patients with increased risk of coagulation abnormalities. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 248 patients undergoing major cardiac and/or aortic surgery. ROTEM and conventional laboratory tests were performed simultaneously after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass and protamine administration to investigate the extrinsic and intrinsic system, and to determine deficiencies in platelets and fibrinogen. We evaluated the association between ROTEM and conventional tests by linear regression analysis and compared the frequency of exceeding established thresholds for clinical intervention. Significant linear associations between ROTEM 10 min after the start of coagulation, and plasma fibrinogen concentration or platelet count (FIBTEM A10, R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001; EXTEM A10, R2 = 0.47, p < 0.001) were obtained. However, the 95% prediction intervals exceeded clinically useful ranges (92–233 mg/dL fibrinogen at the intervention threshold of FIBTEM A10 = 10 mm; 14 × 103–122 × 103/µL platelets at the intervention threshold of EXTEM A10 = 40 mm). The association between EXTEM and INR (R2 = 0.23), and INTEM and aPTT (R2 = 0.095) was poor. The frequency of exceeding intervention thresholds and, consequently, of triggering treatment, varied markedly between ROTEM and conventional tests (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The predictability of conventional coagulation test results by ROTEM is limited, thus hampering the interchangeability of methods in clinical practice.
Highlights
Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) has been established as a point-of-care method to gain information on the coagulation profile in patients who are at high risk of diffuse bleeding in the intra- and postoperative period
Our study tested the hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between the results of ROTEM and conventional coagulation tests, and that plasma fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) can be predicted by ROTEM analyses
Linear regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between EXTEM CT and INR, but the coefficient of determination was poor (Fig. 1A; Table 1)
Summary
Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) has been established as a point-of-care method to gain information on the coagulation profile in patients who are at high risk of diffuse bleeding in the intra- and postoperative period. Studies evaluating the association between ROTEM and conventional coagulation tests in patients undergoing major cardiac or aortic surgery with high risk of postoperative bleeding, as well as the impact of the coagulation assays on clinical decision-making, are lacking. Our study tested the hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between the results of ROTEM and conventional coagulation tests, and that plasma fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, INR, and aPTT can be predicted by ROTEM analyses. We tested the hypothesis, that the frequency of exceeding intervention thresholds, which serves as a trigger for therapeutic decisions in patients with ongoing diffuse bleeding, is comparable between ROTEM and conventional coagulation tests
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
