Abstract

BackgroundTo test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.MethodsPre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022” bracket and 35 with the 0.022” 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.ResultNo statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient’s degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.

Highlights

  • To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets

  • There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects

  • Few studies have dealt with the effects of mechanotherapy on External apical root resorption (EARR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets. External apical root resorption (EARR) presents with a multi-factorial etiology, individual predisposition being one of the factors [8,9,10]. Since the greatest cause of root resorption in the population refers to orthodontic. Few studies have dealt with the effects of mechanotherapy on EARR. The contributing role of continuous tooth movement across various paths, an undesirable effect known as “tooth jiggling,” and the application of inter-maxillary elastics in the development of EARR have been highlighted [18]. An interesting recent study indicated that more EARR occurred

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call