Abstract

"During 2017-2019 Romania faced a controversial justice laws’ ‘reform’, undermining the rule of law and independence of justice principles, challenging the commitments established under Commission Decision 2006/928/EC in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption. In the context of democratic backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe, Romanian evolutions could be seen as following a regional pattern. The study proposes a critical analysis of the most important legislative evolutions in the area of justice and fight against corruption in the region, as reflected by the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism for Romania (CVM) and Rule of Law Reports, European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights judgements. The analysis focuses on some controversial decisions of the Constitutional Court, concerning justice laws ‘reform’ and the application of primacy of EU law principle. The study expresses a strong concern related to Romanian Constitutional Court’s tendencies to walk along the authoritarian path of politically captured courts of Poland and Hungary. The conclusions reveal the requirement for new political instruments of EU supranational intervention to safeguard democratic EU core values."

Highlights

  • Democratic backsliding of Central and Eastern Europe in recent years is attested by many scholarly articles (Cianetti, Dawson and Hanley 2018; Dimitrova, 2018; Gora and de Wilde, 2020; Scott, 2021)

  • Our analysis focuses on Romanian recent evolutions in the field of independence of justice and fight against corruption commitments, falling under Decision 2006/928/EC and Cooperation and Verification Mechanism for Romania (CVM) and Rule of Law reports

  • Political capture of apex courts was drafted by ruling majorities in order to oppose the primacy of EU law and European Court of Justice (ECJ) decisions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Democratic backsliding of Central and Eastern Europe in recent years is attested by many scholarly articles (Cianetti, Dawson and Hanley 2018; Dimitrova, 2018; Gora and de Wilde, 2020; Scott, 2021). Recent Rule of Law Reports (2020, 2021) emphasize some regional patterns that Romania seemed to have followed: large ‘judicial reforms’, political interference in the field of independence of justice and anticorruption institutions, decisions of constitutional courts opposing the principle of EU law primacy and EU law core values.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call