Abstract

Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) occur as important innate immunity agents in many organisms, including humans, and offer a viable alternative to conventional antibiotics, as they physically disrupt the bacterial membranes, leading to membrane lysis and eventually cell death. In this work, we studied the biophysical and microbiological characteristics of designed CAPs varying in hydrophobicity levels and charge distributions by a variety of biophysical and biochemical approaches, including in-tandem atomic force microscopy, attenuated total reflection-FTIR, CD spectroscopy, and SDS-PAGE. Peptide structural properties were correlated with their membrane-disruptive abilities and antimicrobial activities. In bacterial lipid model membranes, a time-dependent increase in aggregated β-strand-type structure in CAPs with relatively high hydrophobicity (such as KKKKKKALFALWLAFLA-NH(2)) was essentially absent in CAPs with lower hydrophobicity (such as KKKKKKAAFAAWAAFAA-NH(2)). Redistribution of positive charges by placing three Lys residues at both termini while maintaining identical sequences minimized self-aggregation above the dimer level. Peptides containing four Leu residues were destructive to mammalian model membranes, whereas those with corresponding Ala residues were not. This finding was mirrored in hemolysis studies in human erythrocytes, where Ala-only peptides displayed virtually no hemolysis up to 320 μM, but the four-Leu peptides induced 40-80% hemolysis at the same concentration range. All peptides studied displayed strong antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 4-32 μM). The overall findings suggest optimum routes to balancing peptide hydrophobicity and charge distribution that allow efficient penetration and disruption of the bacterial membranes without damage to mammalian (host) membranes.

Highlights

  • Cationic antimicrobial peptides offer an alternative to conventional antibiotics, as they physically disrupt bacterial membranes, causing cell death

  • 1) Why does increasing hydrophobicity lead to poorer antimicrobial activity and greater hemolytic toxicity? 2) Will altered charge distribution improve the activity of Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) with the same hydrophobicity level? 3) Which factor, hydrophobicity or charge distribution, is the more important contributor to effective CAP design and bioactivity?

  • We found that charge distribution itself does not dominate the impact on activity because it improves the antimicrobial activity of only the CAP with high hydrophobicity (3K-F17-4L-3K) but reduces the activity of the CAP with low hydrophobicity (3K-F17-3K) (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Background

Cationic antimicrobial peptides offer an alternative to conventional antibiotics, as they physically disrupt bacterial membranes, causing cell death. Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) occur as important innate immunity agents in many organisms, including humans, and offer a viable alternative to conventional antibiotics, as they physically disrupt the bacterial membranes, leading to membrane lysis and eventually cell death. Once the core segment hydrophobicity of the CAPs is beyond an upper threshold, as in the case in which the sequence contains two or more Ala-to-Leu substitutions, the CAPs generally have reduced antimicrobial activity and display increased toxicity to mammalian membranes [14] In agreement with these findings, other workers confirmed the importance of peptide hydrophobicity in membrane selectivity and insertion and for antimicrobial activity [15, 16]. We report the biological activity (and the biophysical characteristics of peptide-membrane interactions) of selected designed CAPs varying systematically in hydrophobicity levels and charge distributions to answer the following questions. 1) Why does increasing hydrophobicity lead to poorer antimicrobial activity and greater hemolytic toxicity? 2) Will altered charge distribution improve the activity of CAPs with the same hydrophobicity level? 3) Which factor, hydrophobicity or charge distribution, is the more important contributor to effective CAP design and bioactivity?

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call