Abstract

Abstract. As the behavior of subglacial water plays a determining role in glacier dynamics, it requires particular attention, especially in the context of climate warming, which is increasing ablation and generating greater amounts of meltwater. On many glaciers, water flowing from the glacier's surface is the main source of supply to the subglacial drainage system. This system is largely influenced by the supraglacial drainage system, which collects meltwater and precipitation and rapidly delivers it to discrete points in the glacier bed via moulins and crevassed areas, called water input areas (WIAs). Models of patterns of subglacial conduits mainly based on the hydrological potential gradient are still regularly performed without taking into account the supraglacial drainage system. We modeled the pattern of subglacial channels in two glaciers located in Svalbard, the land-terminating Werenskioldbreen and the tidewater Hansbreen during the 2015 melt season. We modeled a spatial and a discrete water recharge in order to compare them. First, supraglacial catchments were determined for each WIA on a high-resolution digital elevation model using the standard watershed modeling tool in ArcGIS. Then, interpolated water runoff was calculated for all the main WIAs. Our model also accounts for several water pressure conditions. For our two studied glaciers, during the ablation season 2015, 72.5 % of total runoff was provided by meltwater and 27.5 % by precipitation. Changes in supraglacial drainage on a decadal timescale are observed in contrast to its nearly stable state on an annual timescale. Nevertheless, due to the specific nature of those changes, it seems to have a low impact on the subglacial system. Therefore, our models of subglacial channel are assumed to be valid for a minimum period of two decades and depend on changes in the supraglacial drainage system. Results showed that, for Svalbard tidewater glaciers with large crevassed areas, models of subglacial channels that assume spatial water recharge may be somewhat imprecise but are far from being completely incorrect, especially for the ablation zone. On the other hand, it is important to take discrete water recharge into account in the case of land-terminating Svalbard glaciers with limited crevassed areas. In all cases, considering a discrete water recharge when modeling patterns of theoretical subglacial channels seems to produce more realistic results according to current knowledge.

Highlights

  • In the context of global climate change and, in particular, the rapid melting of glaciers around the world, it is essential to understand changes in their meltwater drainage system and its consequences for glacier behavior

  • Today it is even more important to focus on the hydrological system of Arctic glaciers given that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predict longer summer seasons (Pachauri et al, 2014) and knowing that Svalbard glaciers have already been shrinking for several decades (Błaszczyk et al, 2013; Hagen et al, 2003b)

  • The mapping of the supraglacial drainage systems of the two glaciers in 2015 only included crevassed areas, moulins, superficial percolation zones and runoff places leading to the water input areas (WIAs) used in our model (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the context of global climate change and, in particular, the rapid melting of glaciers around the world, it is essential to understand changes in their meltwater drainage system and its consequences for glacier behavior. All predictions assume an increase in runoff (meltwater and precipitation) from Arctic glaciers, ice caps and ice sheets, suggesting intensification of their whole drainage system and of their dynamics and their impact on sea level rise (Hagen et al, 2003a; Hanna et al, 2008; Mair et al, 2002; Nuth et al, 2010; Sundal et al, 2011). While Greenland and Antarctica are currently considered to be the main future players controlling sea level rise (DeConto and Pollard, 2016; Price et al, 2011; Rignot et al, 2011), it is crucial to understand how supraglacial, englacial and subglacial drainage systems influence each other in a glacier system, as this knowledge will make it possible to improve ice sheet models

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.