Abstract

Introduction. The article unravels the role of court in formation evidential matter in economic disputes in Russia and England. It studies the distinctive features of formation evidential matter in economic disputes in Russia and England, addresses the role of court in the court’s formation of information on facts and (or) digital footprints of facts through providing instructions for formation evidential matter based on the example of electronic documents, evidence of witnesses, and expert evidence in Russia and England.Materials and methods. In the course of writing the work, a set of general scientific, formal-logical methods (including methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, systematization) and special methods (formal-legal, historical, comparative-legal, structural-legal methods, etc.) were used.Research results. The author demonstrates that fact finding of objective truth in economic disputes can be carried out by the court when the following condition are fulfilled: evidentiary materials are formed in the course to the directions of the court. In economic disputes in Russia and England, the court formation evidential matter both for the case as a whole and to provide for expertise.Discussion and conclusion. A conclusion on the similar role of court in formation evidential matter in economic disputes in Russia and England is made. The article formulates suggestions on the improvement of the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.