Role of CACNA1C variants in Brugada syndrome: clinical aspects and genetic testing strategies

Abstract

Abstract Background Inconsistent data support the role of CACNA1C as a disease-causing gene responsible for Brugada syndrome (BrS). As of today, the only gene consistently linked with BrS is SCN5A. Several CACNA1c genetic variants have been reported in association wirh BrS; however, due to the limited evidence, CACNA1C is not suggested for routine genetic screening for BrS. Purpose In this study, we carried out a systematic screening of CACNA1C gene, including a functional evaluation of the identified variants, in order to determine the yield of screening in a large series of BrS probands and to address the hypothesis that an appropriate clinical selection of patients would substantially improve the yield of genetic testing. Methods and results Overall 564 consecutive patients, referred for BrS genetic testing, were sequenced for CACNA1C gene. Patients were divided in two groups: discovery cohort (n=200 patients) and confirmation cohort (n=363 patients). Furthermore, analysis of the clinical phenotypes of a matched SCN5A positive BrS cohort (n=146) was included for phenotype characterization. In the discovery cohort we identified 11 different genetic variants of whom 2 (18%) were considered as potentially causative based on ACMG guidelines. However, a large proportion (81%) was classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). Functional evaluation of the identified variants, including pathogenic and VUS, was assessed by patch-clamp and immunofluorescence studies. Re-evaluation of the variants, including functional studies results, indicated an increase of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (81%) getting a yield of screening of 5% in the discovery cohort. Results from the confirmation cohort confirmed a low rate of CACNA1C carriers with a yield of screening of 2.2%. Analysing the clinical phenotype of all CACNA1C carriers showed a significantly shorter QTc [371 ms ± 16 ms vs. 399±18 ms; p=0.000004]. Furthermore, the prevalence of CACNA1C variants was highest (12.9%) among patients with a QTc in the lowest quartile (QTc <390 ms). ROC curve showed an AUC of 0.91 for QTc a cut-off of 385 ms, suggesting a high predictive accuracy. Conclusion We confirmed that CACNA1C variants are not a common cause of BrS, with a yield of screening of 2–5%. However, pathogenic variants are more frequent (12.5%) in patients with a shorter QTc, suggesting a genetic testing strategy in this subgroup of BrS patients. Furthermore, our data highlights the impact of robust functional studies to improve variant classification and reduce uncertainties. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None