Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation is made of the widely used role conflict and ambiguity scales (RCA) developed by Rizzo, House and Lirtzman (1970). Data on the factor structures, means and standard deviations, internal consistency reliability, and discriminant validity were analyzed and compared to other studies on RCA scales. There are generally consistent positive results across the studies on the psychometric properties of RCA scales. However, this latest study reveals the possibility of social desirability bias in the role ambiguity responses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
