Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase-6 (PDE6) is the key effector enzyme of the phototransduction cascade in rods and cones. The catalytic core of rod PDE6 is a unique heterodimer of PDE6A and PDE6B catalytic subunits. The functional significance of rod PDE6 heterodimerization and conserved differences between PDE6AB and cone PDE6C and the individual properties of PDE6A and PDE6B are unknown. To address these outstanding questions, we expressed chimeric homodimeric enzymes, enhanced GFP (EGFP)-PDE6C-A and EGFP-PDE6C-B, containing the PDE6A and PDE6B catalytic domains, respectively, in transgenic Xenopus laevis. Similar to EGFP-PDE6C, EGFP-PDE6C-A and EGFP-PDE6C-B were targeted to the rod outer segments and concentrated at the disc rims. PDE6C, PDE6C-A, and PDE6C-B were isolated following selective immunoprecipitation of the EGFP fusion proteins. All three enzymes, PDE6C, PDE6C-A, and PDE6C-B, hydrolyzed cGMP with similar K(m) (20-23 μM) and k(cat) (4200-5100 s(-1)) values. Likewise, the K(i) values for PDE6C, PDE6C-A, and PDE6C-B inhibition by the cone- and rod-specific PDE6 γ-subunits (Pγ) were comparable. Recombinant cone transducin-α (Gα(t2)) and native rod Gα(t1) fully and potently activated PDE6C, PDE6C-A, and PDE6C-B. In contrast, the half-maximal activation of bovine rod PDE6 required markedly higher concentrations of Gα(t2) or Gα(t1). Our results suggest that PDE6A and PDE6B are enzymatically equivalent. Furthermore, PDE6A and PDE6B are similar to PDE6C with respect to catalytic properties and the interaction with Pγ but differ in the interaction with transducin. This study significantly limits the range of mechanisms by which conserved differences between PDE6A, PDE6B, and PDE6C may contribute to remarkable differences in rod and cone physiology.
Highlights
Proteins [1,2,3]
The striated peripheral pattern of enhanced GFP (EGFP) fluorescence in transgenic EGFP-PDE6 is composed of two identical ␣Ј-subunits (PDE6C)-A and EGFP-PDE6C-B rods was indistinguishable from the distribution of EGFP-PDE6C observed previously (Fig. 1B and supplemental Fig. 2) [19]
PDE6A and PDE6B may bind P␥ with different affinities, which in turn may differ from the avidity of the PDE6C-P␥ interaction [24]
Summary
Proteins [1,2,3]. In contrast, the physiology of rods and cones is strikingly different. This finding may indicate that PDE6A-P␥ and PDE6B-P␥ have significantly different affinities for G␣t-GTP and that the binding of G␣t to the lower affinity site does not lead to PDE6 activation. The heterogeneity of transducin-binding sites on rod PDE6 could originate from potential differences in PDE6A-P␥ and PDE6B-P␥ interactions, resulting in different mechanisms of PDE6 activation in rods and cones.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
