"Robust, replicable, and theoretically-grounded: A response to Brown and Coyne's (2017) commentary on the relationship between emodiversity and health": Correction to Quoidbach et al. (2018).

Abstract

Reports an error in "Robust, replicable, and theoretically-grounded: A response to Brown and Coyne's (2017) commentary on the relationship between emodiversity and health" by Jordi Quoidbach, Moïra Mikolajczak, June Gruber, Ilios Kotsou, Aleksandr Kogan and Michael I. Norton (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2018[Mar], Vol 147[3], 451-458). In the article, there is an error in the byline for the first author due to a printer error. The complete, correct institutional affiliation for Jordi Quoidbach is ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-06787-002.) In 2014 in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, we reported 2 studies demonstrating that the diversity of emotions that people experience-as measured by the Shannon-Wiener entropy index-was an independent predictor of mental and physical health, over and above the effect of mean levels of emotion. Brown and Coyne (2017) questioned both our use of Shannon's entropy and our analytic approach. We thank Brown and Coyne for their interest in our research; however, both their theoretical and empirical critiques do not undermine the central theoretical tenets and empirical findings of our research. We present an in-depth examination that reveals that our findings are statistically robust, replicable, and reflect a theoretically grounded phenomenon with real-world implications. (PsycINFO Database Record