Robert Hooke, Rudolf Erich Raspe, and the Concept of "Earthquakes"

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessRobert Hooke, Rudolf Erich Raspe, and the Concept of "Earthquakes"Albert V. CarozziAlbert V. Carozzi Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 61, Number 1Spring, 1970 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/350580 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 8Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1970 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Francesco G. Sacco Matter and History, (Jun 2020): 145–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_7Jennifer Ferng Evidentiary Earthquakes: Design and Discontinuity through Seismic Methods, Leonardo (Dec 2014).https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00966Olaf Briese Das bezwungene Erdbeben. Wissenschaftsgeschichte als Mentalitätengeschichte, (Jan 1998): 87–178.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04287-3_2Frances Willmoth John Flamsteed's letter concerning the natural causes of earthquakes, Annals of Science 44, no.11 (Aug 2006): 23–70.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798700200111 Giorgio Ranalli Robert Hooke and the Huttonian Theory, The Journal of Geology 90, no.33 (Sep 2015): 319–325.https://doi.org/10.1086/628682ROY PORTER, KATE POULTON Geology in Britain, 1660–1800: a selective biographical bibliography, Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History 9, no.11 (Nov 1978): 74–84.https://doi.org/10.3366/jsbnh.1978.9.1.74ROY PORTER, KATE POULTON Geology in Britain, 1660–1800: a selective biographical bibliography, Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History 9, no.PART_1PART_1 (Nov 1978): 74–84.https://doi.org/10.3366/jsbnh.1978.9.PART_1.74D. R. Oldroyd Robert Hooke's Methodology of Science as exemplified in his ‘Discourse of Earthquakes’, The British Journal for the History of Science 6, no.22 (Jan 2009): 109–130.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400012243