Abstract

BackgroundRice is staple food for over two billion people. Planthoppers like BPH and WBPH occur together in most of rice growing regions across Asia and cause extensive yield loss by feeding and transmission of disease-causing viruses. Chemical control of the pest is expensive and ecologically disastrous; breeding resistant varieties is an acceptable option. But most of such efforts are focused on BPH with an assumption that these varieties will also be effective against WBPH. No critical studies are available to understand rice resistance, common or otherwise, against these two planthoppers.ResultsOur studies aimed to understand the defense mechanisms in rice line RP2068 against BPH and WBPH through RNA sequencing analysis of a RIL line TR3RR derived from the cross TN1 (susceptible) and RP2068 (resistant) after infestation with BPH or WBPH. Results revealed higher number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in BPH infested plants than in WBPH infested plants when compared with the uninfested plants. These DEGs could be grouped into UPUP, DNDN, UPDN and DNUP groups based on whether the DEGs were up (UP) or down (DN) regulated against BPH and WBPH, respectively. Gene ontology analysis, specially of members of the last two groups, revealed differences in plant response to the two planthoppers. Abundance of miRNAs and detection of their target genes also indicated that separate sets of genes were suppressed or induced against BPH and WBPH. These results were validated through the analysis of expression of 27 genes through semi-quantitative and quantitative real-time RT-PCR using a set of five RILs that were genetically identical but with different reaction against the two planthoppers. Coupled with data obtained through pathway analysis involving these 27 genes, expression studies revealed common and differential response of rice RP2068 against BPH and WBPH. Trehalose biosynthesis, proline transport, methylation were key pathways commonly upregulated; glucosinolate biosynthesis, response to oxidative stress, proteolysis, cytokinesis pathways were commonly down regulated; photosynthesis, regulation of transcription, expression and transport of peptides and defense related pathways were exclusively upregulated against WBPH; MYB transcription factor mediated defense induction was exclusive to BPH.ConclusionRice defense against the two sympatric planthoppers: BPH and WBPH has distinct features in RP2068. Hence, a conscious combination of resistance to these two pests is essential for effective field management.

Highlights

  • Rice is staple food for over two billion people

  • While resistance to brown planthopper (BPH) among Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) segregated in 25R:155S suggesting possible involvement of three genes (χ2 = 0.343; P = 0.558), resistance to whitebacked planthopper (WBPH) among RILs segregated in 37R:143S suggesting two gene involvement (χ2 = 1.896; P = 0.168)

  • Our results revealed that a larger number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were down-regulated, in comparison to up-regulated DEGs, in plants following the planthopper infestation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rice is staple food for over two billion people. Planthoppers like BPH and WBPH occur together in most of rice growing regions across Asia and cause extensive yield loss by feeding and transmission of diseasecausing viruses. Significant amount of the rice production is lost annually due to biotic stresses, of which about 25% is attributed to the insect pests (Savary et al 2000) Planthoppers, such as brown planthopper (BPH) [Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)] and whitebacked planthopper (WBPH) [Sogatella furcifera (Horváth)] have again attained peak pest status in Asia since the beginning of this century (Bentur and Viraktamath 2008; Bottrell and Schoenly 2012). These insect pests inflict losses by direct sap sucking from rice and by acting as vectors of disease-causing plant viruses (Zhou et al 2008). Breeding rice varieties resistant to these pests would be an environmentally safe and ecologically acceptable alternative approach to manage these pests (Brar et al 2009)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call