Abstract

ABSTRACTOne of the most powerful claims of disability theology is that the rejection of persons with disabilities somehow correlates with a rejection of God. This ‘correlative rejection’ is, however, frequently just stated rather than explored in detail, something this article therefore seeks to remedy by examining one example of the correlative rejection that draws together the ethical concerns of theologians writing on intellectual disability with Meister Eckhart’s teaching on the human relationship with God. Here, the correlative rejection is exposed as an inevitable result of the narrow emphasis on autonomy and rationality in human self-perception which shape the habituated, even ritualised ways that we try to know persons with intellectual disabilities and God. By contrast, truly knowing and relating to persons with intellectual disabilities, God, and finally also ourselves, relies on a reconciliation with the dependence, vulnerability, and non-rational forms of exchange that a narrow attachment to autonomy and rationality seems directly to occlude. The correlative rejection thus signals both a practical and epistemological problem which results from how we view ourselves and how we subsequently relate to and try to know others, the harmful effects of which are both ethical and spiritual.

Highlights

  • At the heart of much disability theology lies a powerful claim ‘To reject the disabled because they are disabled is to reject God’.1 Taking this claim seriously means recognising that the social and ethical concerns raised by disability theology represent a profoundly theological problem

  • One of the most powerful claims of disability theology is that the rejection of persons with disabilities somehow correlates with a rejection of God

  • The correlative rejection is exposed as an inevitable result of the narrow emphasis on autonomy and rationality in human self-perception which shape the habituated, even ritualised ways that we try to know persons with intellectual disabilities and God

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At the heart of much disability theology lies a powerful claim ‘To reject the disabled because they are disabled is to reject God’.1 Taking this claim seriously means recognising that the social and ethical concerns raised by disability theology represent a profoundly theological problem. Vulnerable, and cognitively impaired, the lives of persons with intellectual disabilities cannot but contradict a view of human wholeness, worth, and relating which prioritises autonomy and rationality.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.