Abstract

Sustainable livelihood approach has been a strategic approach that can improve the economy of rural communities and create harmonization of socio-cultural, economic, environmental and political development through policies. However, it is holistic and contextual, enabling the existence of different capital characteristics formed based on the community's culture. The Indonesian context shows that customary rituals of the community in Kakara and Limau villages in North Halmahera Regency are forms of capital that mobilize claims and access to capital such as natural, human, physical, financial, and social capital. This article aims to describe the ritual capital in rural livelihood for sustainable tourism development. Key informants involved were leaders of community, traditions, religion and rural government and they were interviewed to obtain in-depth information about the ritual capital. The results indicate that the ritual capital was integrated with the rural tourism development, enhancing the capabilities of the customary community in the Kakara and Limau Village to access other capital. This finding supports the argument explaining that ritual capital is a livelihood asset in the context of tourism development in North Halmahera Regency, Indonesia.

Highlights

  • Research on livelihoods in rural areas has developed since the 1990s and become an important issue in discussing efforts to alleviate rural poverty (McAreavey & McDonagh, 2011)

  • Considering the framework of the sustainable livelihood Aapproach (SLA) adopted and reconstructed by Chambers and Conway (1991) on livelihood assets, this study offers an idea to consider ritual as a form of capital supporting sustainable livelihoods

  • This paper presents the livelihood system of the traditional community in North Halmahera Regency, Indonesia which refers to ritual capital and five livelihood capitals such as human, social, natural, financial, and physical capital

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research on livelihoods in rural areas has developed since the 1990s and become an important issue in discussing efforts to alleviate rural poverty (McAreavey & McDonagh, 2011). The Sustainable Livelihood Framework is seen as an effective strategy to solve poverty problems (Norton & Foster, 2001). Chambers and Conway (1991) classified resources as livelihood assets that can be used to alleviate poverty. Scoones (1998) described livelihood assets as natural, economic, human, and social capital to maintain livelihood sustainability in rural areas through agricultural intensification or extensification, livelihood diversification, and migration. Ashley and Carney (1999) developed a sustainable livelihood framework based on empirical experience as a practical guide for practitioners and development agents.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call